We know the truth, not only by the reason, but also by the heart.

Archive for February, 2010

Michael Jackson “The Discovery” part 1 to 6


Famous Crime Scene : Michael Jackson’s Death

Vodpod videos no longer available.


Bloodied shirt MJ’s closet

Originally published in August 2009 and released again today, Feb 28, 2010. WHY?

By PETE SAMSON

Originally Published: 06 Aug 2009

A WOMEN’S blouse appearing to be stained with blood hangs in Michael Jackson’s wardrobe – sparking a new mystery over the superstar’s death.

It still has a price label attached, indicating it had not been worn and could have been used to mop up blood.

The picture, among a remarkable set that emerged yesterday, was taken days after Jacko died in June.

MICHAEL JACKSON

Tragic … Michael Jackson

It is thought the blouse was NOT seized by police probing the 50-year-old singer’s death in his rented Los Angeles home.

Last night leading US lawyer Craig Silverman said: “It’s pretty extraordinary that a bloody shirt would not be taken as evidence.”

Mr Silverman, who is not involved with the case, said it could be a clue to what went wrong with Dr Conrad Murray’s treatment of Jacko – or the personal physician’s attempts to revive him.

The blouse’s label reads, “Women’s Clothing – Casual Top” with a price of just $3.99.

Los Angeles police could shed no light on the mystery last night.

Asked why the shirt was not taken in by investigators, a spokesman replied: “I don’t know why.”

He added: “Our detectives aren’t speaking to the media about the investigation so we won’t have an answer at the moment. I don’t foresee one for some time.”


Will.I.Am: Thank You Michael Jackson

[Dipdive] iamwill » TV.


Michael Jackson Death Hoax Summary Part 1 to 3


Charles Manson: reality is now.

Huhhh,  quite insightful for a killer… makes me question what we really KNOW about him.  DO we know the truth?

Or do we know only what the media portrayed? What’s the truth???  What’s he trying to say?


Michael Jackson could still be aLIvE (Sequel Part 27)

Pianogames latest video on MJ’s hoax death. Quite a bright fellow, that one…


Soldiers of Love-Michael Jackson-Sade Part I and II

Hhhhmmmm, this videos is quite interesting. When  I heard of Sade’s new song  “Soldier of Love” I immediately thought of MJ.

It seems now that he definitely had something to do with it, whether in a direct or indirect way…  Some scenes definitely remind me of Earth Song. No doubt that was deliberate.

Thanks to my friend Carita for having told me about this video today….


The white horse in Sade’s video reminds me of this painting:


Unplug the Signal: The Truth Will Not Be Televised

Nathan Janes
PUPAGANDA.com

A flow of information is constantly streaming from the television set; a bombardment of words and pictures.  The speed at which this information is communicated makes it easy for the signal to take control, switching the viewer’s brain to stand-by as information is absorbed without analysis or question. Today the television’s constant signal shapes the conclusions of the masses and produces the collective norm.  The signal prescribes what is news and what is truth through the words of so-called experts and authorities, gelding the consciousness and independent thoughts of those subjected to it. Through television, the masses can be made to accept the most monstrous distortions of reality. The signal is a chill wind of continuous oppression over the minds of the masses. It controls the management of society and culture, creating uniformity across all subjects.

The fuel for this vehicle of mass deception is a technique known as perception management where an array of psychological techniques are used to alter the truth, leading the viewer to a desired conclusion. Some call this spin or propaganda while others know it as lying.  According to Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Minister for Adolph Hitler, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it… It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” Most of what can be found on the nightly news is nothing but advertisements selling more government and a false reality that benefits only those in control. Television is the dictator of information; newspaper and radio are the whisper campaign of the television’s message.

It is expected that Americans will consistently prescribe to the doctrine of the television. It is subtly communicated that one should stay within the collective and never challenge the message, for doing so may be considered an aggression towards culture. The message is, “Be a good consumer; always obey authority; you know nothing; listen only to experts; be content and never question or express new ideas.” This signal is being broadcast across millions of screens, indoctrinating the unconscious minds of those who choose this as their only reality. Self-censorship occurs when these individuals become so deeply indoctrinated that they are afraid to discuss any information outside the paradigm of television-created culture; they police their thoughts to ensure they won’t conflict with this culture. Sadly, many people’s reality today does not allow any outside information to process, instead it is written off as conspiracy or blatant lies. Our consciousness has been destroyed so much that fiction has become reality. An entire lifestyle of poisonous foods, pharmaceuticals, and fluoridated water are accepted as safe and sold to us at the cost of our health and well being.

Those of the establishment are using the incredibly powerful weapon of mass psychology as a method of controlling the minds of the masses and altering the behavior of individuals. Edward Bernays, a pioneer in the field of public relations in the 20th century, applied Sigmund Freud’s theory of psychoanalysis to manipulate the masses by engineering consent. According to Bernays, “If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without them knowing it.” Advertisers and psychologists of the billion dollar culture creation industry manufacture trends through the proliferation of insecurities; and manipulating desires and emotions. These concepts are also employed to control how individuals think about politics, as well as the possibilities and limitations within society.  Those wielding power within our streams of mass communication market their plans into each generation as individuals adopt specific ways of thinking and never suspect that all the major events and trends within their lifetime are actually planned by an elite few before they are even born. In our society today, culture is created from the top down. Virtually all forms of culture are created by the ruling class to build a false sense of reality, ensure social compliance, and control the future course of cultural evolution.

Predictive programming is a tool used by the establishment to acclimate the public to new ideas, trends, beliefs, and threats. It is used through television by including certain situations or ideas within the plots of many fictional shows, familiarizing the viewer with these concepts no matter what they may be watching.  When similar situations occur or like ideas are circulated in the world we think that these particular things are quite natural for we have unknowingly been made familiar with them through television. By viewing nearly any popular show on television, one can see the same propaganda that will be aired on the nightly news. Propaganda on a wide array of subjects has been interwoven into a great number of television shows. Just a few of these subjects include global warming, vaccinations, torture, terrorism, national security, the militarization of police, and the degradation of the family unit. Through predictive programming, television shapes culture and prevents individuals from asking questions.

Crises are created on a daily basis and broadcast across the airwaves to keep individuals in a state of panic and fear. Whether it be the threat of a pandemic or terrorism, the constant state of crisis has created a form of mental illness as we are slowly acclimated into an age of crisis. By using Hegelian dialectic, the television promotes the problem, guides our reaction, and presents the solution. The problem of terrorism was exclaimed, a strong emotional response was evoked, and it was stated that our rights need be sacrificed in order to protect us from the threat. We’ve lost personal sovereignty under the guise of terrorism; we’re stopped and searched; we’re watched by cameras as we go about our lives; and we’re encouraged to spy on our neighbors.  We have been trained to accept the life of a prisoner.

America is in a state of enlightened despotism where most individuals live only to satisfy selfish inner desires and remain ignorant of the state of the world around them. In most public places one can find a television transmitting propaganda around the clock ensuring the masses remain focused on trivial matters. From birth we take the world as it’s presented on television.  We don’t question it and any serious criticism of TV is becoming psychologically impossible in society. Who would suspect getting born into a world where everything around you is a continuous lie? The youth of today are convinced that the experts and personalities on television are the authority of credible information while parents and older generations are foolish with dated ideas.  Children are conditioned to disconnect from what is truly important to their well being and instead focus on mindless trivia, sports, celebrity gossip, and buying an array of material things. They invest their psychological worth in fantasy characters on television while ignoring or even scorning individuals contributing to the betterment of humanity. They are discouraged from getting involved in their local community and often lack the ability to think independently or to resist corruption. As their children’s minds are molded by television, there is barely a murmur from the public.

For over half a century, our society has lived under this signal of mental programming and conditioning. The message is clear: don’t be a leader, don’t engage in critical thinking, and don’t care about the people in your life. Until individuals become aware of the current information war, our standard of living and our liberties will continue to be degraded and we will continue to lose communities and meaningful relationships between people. Currently, pockets of resistance are beginning to spring up everywhere as some unplug the signal and regain control of their own thoughts. Informed individuals are canceling their cable and satellite subscriptions and instead spending time with their families and children while participating in meaningful experiences. They are seeking alternative news sources. They are reading about those who weld incredible influence over culture like Edward Bernays, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Charles Galton Darwin, Plato, Bertrand Russell, and Aldous Huxley. However, it is a continuous battle to educate the masses for the television remains our greatest threat to individual sovereignty and the largest obstacle to becoming a truly informed individual. Fortunately, unplugging from the signal is easy. The television can simply be turned off. Through doing so, you may realize nearly our entire world is now a hoax; things once known as truth are fake. We have been trained like dogs to be obedient to our television; our master has had our minds on a tight leash. Let us never forget the truth will not be televised.


Michael Jackson Private Investigator speaks out

Exclusive: Michael Jackson Private Investigator  Speaks Out An ex-private investigator working in Las Vegas in the 90’s, was an insider in a plot to discredit Michael Jackson. Here he reveals exclusively to mjfiles how the conspiracy against Michael Jackson began: “Michael Jackson was a guest of Steve Wynn, at His Mirage Casino, in Las Vegas, on several occasions. This was around the same time LaToya was on stage in Paris, with the Moulin Rouge. I was working part time for a Las Vegas private detective, and commuting to Los Angeles, to work on films. The investigator I worked for had someone at the Mirage Casino,

in Las Vegas, on several occasions. This was around the same time LaToya was on stage in Paris, with the Moulin Rouge. I was working part time for a Las Vegas private detective, and commuting to Los Angeles, to work on films.

The investigator I worked for had someone at the Mirage Casino, to call when Michael was visiting, or if he and his driver/bodyguard was going out at night. I thought at the time, that the Boss wanted to get into some paparazzi action, because it was not a case the agency was working on.

My teacher and chief investigator [at the agency], told me some of the information he was getting on Michael Jackson. At that time, he thought it was very funny. Michael would be driven around parking lots, and thru fast food places, and his guy would jump out and run into stores while Michael would stay in the car. MJ was cruising the parking lot for these reasons; celebs have a hard time just looking around, I have driven several around parking lots myself, just to get a malt and look at the lights, but MJ was being driven around the area known as the ‘Fruit Loop’, and in the parking lot of the Gypsy Bar (the oldest gay club in Las Vegas). He also was at the Glass Pool, this is an Icon of a motel, in the fashion world (lots of still shoots).

On July the 11th [1993], I got the call to come over to The Bosses house to have a drink, and that is when I was told about working a case to discredit Michael Jackson. And be around for the first calls. It was then clear to see this was in the planning stages for some time. My teacher and Chief investigator, knew I grew up in LA, and had worked all over the town, plus he wanted super good video, on this case. This was the day the office got the first calls about Michael and Jordan. June S. [Schwartz] was in a panic over what she had just seen, (that day or the day before ?)  and it is my understanding that it was part of the settlement, to never repeat it.

[That same month] My Boss said,’hey would you like to go to Beverly Hills and go to Melvin Belli’s 86th birthday party’ I said yes, very fast. Melvin Belli was the Bosses ‘Gumba’ [friend] and I knew it would be some bash. I was at Melvin’s birthday party around July the 28th in Beverly Hills, and at that party this was said by someone that was (PI) that I thought was on MJ’s side, ‘they are going to clean him’ him being MJ, and this was said with laughter.

MY boss said the case was to prove MJ was a ‘chicken hawk’, and was contributing to the delinquency of a minor, but June thought it was to prove molestation. This is a very important point. June did not have the money to pay for such a big case, let alone Melvin Belli, old or not.  Jordan was a way to get something on Michael without it being straight-out blackmail.

This is all a fact, and more than a few people in Las Vegas know about this. We never got to do the case. Evan Chandler got costody of Jordan, and took it to the police. It was my understanding, that the case was not to be about children, or go public. The ‘Devils’ are in the details of what happened…”

Copyright: mjfiles.com


Michael Jackson Message

Hhhhmmm , when was THIS recorded???  Doesn’t look old.


Doctors Warn About Dangers of Genetically Modified Food

This is the whole point of GM food: hidden agenda…

Thursday, February 25, 2010 by: David Gutierrez

The American Academy of Environmental Medicine has warned that the public should avoid genetically modified (GM) foods, stating, “There is more than a casual association between GM foods and adverse health effects. There is causation.”

A large number of studies and incidents have implicated GM foods in a wide variety of health problems, including accelerated aging, immune dysfunction, insulin disorders, organ damage and reproductive disruption.

For example, female rats fed a diet of GM soy experienced a drastically higher infant death rate, and their surviving infants were smaller and less fertile than the offspring of rats fed on a non-GM soy diet. Male rats fed the GM soy had their testicles change from pink to blue, and the GM soy was also observed to damage the DNA of sperm and embryos. Fertility problems such as abortion, infertility, premature delivery, prolapsed uteri, infant death, and even delivery of unformed infants (bags of water) have been observed in farm animals fed GM cottonseed and corn.

Animals consuming crops that have been genetically modified to produce the pesticide Bt (approved for human consumption in the United States) have died by the thousands, while animals grazing on a non-GM version of the same crops remained unharmed. Upon autopsies, researchers have found black patches in the animals’ livers and intestines, internal bleeding and other signs of Bt poisoning. Farm workers in India have begun developing allergic reactions upon handling Bt corn, similar to the effects experienced by people exposed to Bt spraying.

In addition to these risks, GM soy and corn contain significantly higher concentrations of allergens than unmodified varieties. Evidence also suggests that the genetic abnormalities of GM foods may transfer to bacteria in the human gut, thereby exposing people to their detrimental effects long after a food has been consumed.

Yet in spite of all this evidence and the prevalence of GM crops in the U.S. food supply not a single clinical trial of any GM crop has ever been published.

“The experiments simply haven’t been done and we now have become the guinea pigs,” said Canadian geneticist David Suzuki. “Anyone that says, ‘Oh, we know that this is perfectly safe,’ I say is either unbelievably stupid or deliberately lying.”


The Death Of Michael Jackson: HIS tory in the making


Orianthi and Jermaine slip-ups

Notice how Orianthi keeps going on about the “film”…  Thought it was a concert,lol

And Jermaine… well, what can I say? 😉


Truth Campaign (Wake up call)

Great videos by Maura (mjfanforeverandaday on utube)!


Joe Jackson Wins Right To Michael Jackson Medical Records

By Dissent, February 21, 2010 8:26 am

Joe Jackson has taken one step forward in his quest to file a wrongful death suit following the passing of his superstar son last June.

In papers obtained by RadarOnline.com the Superior Court of California ruled on Friday that Joe be allowed access to Michael Jackson’s medical records, something that the singer’s Estate had fought against, citing physician-patient privilege.

Read more on RadarOnline.com. The court’s ruling can be found here.

The Estate’s opposition to Joe Jackson’s request for records was not only based on physician-patient privilege, but also on the grounds of privacy and relevance. The court quickly dismissed the privacy claim, holding, as had previous courts, that the right to privacy can only be asserted by the individual whose privacy has allegedly been invaded, and the right to privacy does not extend past death — unlike patient-physician confidentiality, which does extend past death.

So how could Joe Jackson get around doctor-patient confidentiality? His attorneys argued that since Michael was dead on arrival at the hospital, there was no communication and hence, no privilege attaches.

The whole case arises because Joe Jackson claims he was financially dependent on Michael Jackson and wants to sue UCLA for wrongful death so that he can get more money than he is not now getting from the estate as an allowance.

I wonder what would happen if a non-blood relative initiated a similar action. Could courts wind up ordering the release of hospital records to whomever can make a case that they want to sue a physician over a non-relative’s treatment because the deceased had provided them some financial support that they no longer get from the estate because the deceased did not leave them anything in his will?


Court petition by Joe jackson to have MJ’s UCLA records

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Date: February 19, 2010 DEPARTMENT 5
HONORABLE: Mitchell L. Beckloff
DEPUTY SHERIFF: NOME
M. Dewey, DEPUTY JUDICIAL ASSISTANT
No REPORTER
BP 117321
In re the Estate of Michael
Joseph Jackson
(Parties and Counsel checked if present)
COUNSEL FOR
PETITIONER N/A
COUNSEL FOR
RESPONDENT N/A
RULING ON SUBMITTED MATTER
(Motion to Quash)
This matter is before the court on The Estate of Michael Jackson’s Notice of Motion and
Motion to Quash the Deposition Subpoena for Production of Business Records Served on
UCLA Medical Center/UCLA Health Systems and Request for Attorneys’ Fees in the
Amount of $8,856.25 (the “Motion to Quash”) filed January 14, 2010.
The Special Administrator’s for the Estate of Michael Jackson seek an order quashing “in
its entirety” the “deposition subpoena for production of business records served on UCLA
Medical Center/UCLA Health Systems by Petitioner Joseph Jackson. The request is
based on three grounds: Privacy, Physician-Patient privilege, and relevance.
The Special Administrators assert that Michael Jackson’s fundamental privacy rights
prevent disclosure of the UCLA medical records. {Motion to Quash, p. 8.) While the court
acknowledges that medical records are documents to which the right of privacy attaches,
Michael Jackson’s right of privacy does not apply under these facts because Michael
Jackson is deceased.
“It is well settled that the right to privacy is purely a personal one; it cannot be asserted by
anyone other than the person whose privacy has been invaded . . . .
Further, the right does not survive but dies with the person.” (Hendrickson v. California
Newspapers, Inc. (1975) 48 Cal.App.3d 59, 62. See also Moreno v. Hanford Sentinel, Inc.
(2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 1125, 1131.)
The authorities cited by the Special Administrators do not provide otherwise. The Motion
to Quash is denied on the daim of privacy.
Physician-Patient Privilege
The Special Administrators hold Michael Jackson’s physician-patient privilege. (Evid.
Code sec. 953, subd. (c).) The privilege may be asserted after an individual’s death.
(Rittenhouse v. Superior Court (1991) 235 Cal.App.3d 1584,1588.)
Minutes Entered:
Department 5
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Date: February 19, 2010 DEPARTMENT 5
HONORABLE: Mitchell L. Beckloff
DEPUTY SHERIFF: NONE
M. Dewey, DEPUTY JUDICIAL ASSISTANT
No REPORTER
BP 117321
In re the Estate of Michael
Joseph Jackson
(Parties and Counsel checked if present)
COUNSEL FOR
PETITIONER N/A
COUNSEL FOR
RESPONDENT N/A
Joseph Jackson argues, however, that the privilege is not implicated herein because
Michael Jackson “was deceased when he arrived at UCLA.” (Memorandum in Opposition,
p. 6.) Joseph Jackson contends that “because Michael Jackson had no heart beat, no
pulse, no respirations, and no vital signs for hours prior to his admission to UCLA, he
made no communications to any of the doctors and had no physician-patient privilege.”
(Memorandum in Opposition, p. 6.)
On this record, the court cannot determine whether and to what extent a “patient” may
have had “confidential communications” with his health care providers at UCLA Medical
Center. (See Evid. Code sees. 991 and 992.)
To evaluate the applicability of the privilege asserted by the Special Administrators, the
court is required to examine the requested records in camera.
Relevance
Code of Civil Procedure section 2017.010 provides in part: “Unless otherwise limited by
order of the court in accordance with this title, any party may obtain discovery regarding
any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending
action . . . if the matter either is itself admissible in evidence or appears reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” “‘[Tjhe relevance of the
subject matter standard must be reasonably applied;… in accordance with the liberal
policies underlying the discovery procedures, doubts as to relevance should generally be
resolved in favor of permitting discovery … .”‘ (Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co. v.
Superior Court (1982) 31 Cal.Sd 785, 790 {quoting Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Superior
Court (1970) 2 Cal.3d 161, 173].)
The pending action is Joseph Jackson’s petition for family allowance. Thus, the subject
matter before the court includes Joseph Jackson’s financial situation and his need, if any,
for financial support from Michael Jackson’s estate during the course of administration.
Assuming Joseph Jackson makes the necessary showing that he was “actually dependent
in whole or in part upon [Michael Jackson] for support, the court “may” provide Joseph
Jackson a “reasonable family allowance out of the estate as the court in its discretion
determines is necessary for [his] maintenance according to [his] circumstances
Minutes Entered:
Department 5
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Date: February 19, 2010 DEPARTMENT 5
HONORABLE: Mitchell L. Beckloff
DEPUTY SHERIFF: NONE
M. Dewey, DEPUTY JUDICIAL ASSISTANT
No REPORTER
BP 117321
In re the Estate of Michael
Joseph Jackson
(Parties and Counsel checked if present)
COUNSEL FOR
PETITIONER N/A
COUNSEL FOR
RESPONDENT N/A
(Prob. Code sec. 6540, subd. (b).) The court has broad discretion in setting the amount of
a family allowance award.
Joseph Jackson has argued that he intends to file a wrongful death action for the death of
Michael Jackson. The Code of Civil Procedure provides him with standing for such an
action assuming he was “dependent” upon Michael Jackson. (Code of Civ. Proc. Sec.
377.60, subd. (b).)
According to Joseph Jackson, his pursuit of the wrongful death action directly impacts his
financial circumstances. He claims that to the extent he pays legal fees and/or costs, his
need for a family allowance is increased. That is, as he incurs more legal expenses, he
needs more money for his maintenance.
Joseph Jackson claims that the UCLA Medical Center records are necessary to evaluate
his wrongful death claim for purposes of determining the likely cost of pursuing that action.
He asserts that the records will provide the necessary foundation for evidence he will
present at the family allowance hearing about his overall ongoing financial needs during
the course of estate administration.
Given the applicable standards and Joseph Jackson’s stated justification for the UCLA
Medical Center records, the Motion to Quash is denied on the grounds of relevance. The
court finds that the requested records are reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence in the pending family allowance matter.
confidentiality.
The parties are ordered to meet and confer for purposes of reaching a stipulation with
regard to the confidentiality of the UCLA Medical Records. The court will require Joseph
Jackson and his attorneys, Mr. Oxman and Ms. Jaroscak, to sign the confidentiality
agreement. Any expert consulted by Joseph Jackson shall be required to sign the
confidentiality agreement, will not be permitted to make copies of the records and shall
return the records to Joseph Jackson’s attorney at the conclusion of the consultation.
Minutes Entered:
Department 5
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Date: February 19, 2010 DEPARTMENT 5
HONORABLE: Mitchell L. Beckloff
DEPUTY SHERIFF: NONE
M. Dewey, DEPUTY JUDICIAL ASSISTANT
No REPORTER
BP 117321
In re the Estate of Michael
Joseph Jackson
(Parties and Counsel checked if present)
COUNSEL FOR
PETITIONER N/A
COUNSEL FOR
RESPONDENT N/A
Subpoena Revision
The court finds the subpoena to be overbroad. Joseph Jackson shall limit the scope of
the request to documents created on or after June 25, 2009, communications occurring on
or after June 25, 2009, and correspondence dated on or after June 25, 2009.
in Camera Review
As noted, the court is required to examine the documents produced pursuant to the
subpoena in camera to evaluate the physician-patient privilege claim. The documents are
to be subpoenaed directly to Department 5 of this court for such review. Joseph
Jackson’s attorneys shall make arrangements to ensure that the documents are handdelivered
to the clerk of this department. The parties are to meet and confer concerning
the delivery of the documents to this court and take appropriate steps to ensure the
security of the documents.
Sanctions
The Estate’s request for sanctions is denied.
A copy of this order is sent this date by way of facsimile transmission to Attorneys Howard
Weitzman (FAX: 310-566-9871) and Brian Oxman (FAX: 714-521-1317). The court
clerk’s Certificate of Mailing otherwise reflects the service of this order.
Paul Gordon Hoffman, Esq., Hoffman, Sabban et al., 10880 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2200
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Howard Weitzman, Esq., Kinsella, Weitzman et al., 808 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90401
Joseph Zimring, Esq., Office of the Attorney General, 300 S. Spring Street, Suite 1702
Los Angeles, CA90013
Margaret Lodise, Esq., Sacks, Glazier et al., 350 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 3500
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Brian Oxman, Esq., 14126 East Rosecrans Blvd., Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
4 Minutes Entered:
Department 5
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Date: February 19, 2010 DEPARTMENT 5
HONORABLE: Mitchell L. Beckloff
DEPUTY SHERIFF: NONE
M. Dewey, DEPUTY JUDICIAL ASSISTANT
No REPORTER
BP 117321
In re the Estate of Michael
Joseph Jackson
(Parties and Counsel checked if present)
COUNSEL FOR
PETITIONER N/A
COUNSEL FOR
RESPONDENT N/A
Adam Streisand, Esq., Loeb and Loeb, 10100 Santa Monica Blvd.,
Los Angeles, CA 90067
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action. I am familiar with the Los Angeles Superior Court practice for
collection and processing of correspondence and know that such correspondence is deposited with postage prepaid with the United
States Postal Service the same day it is delivered to the mailroom in the Los Angeles Superior Court. I declare under penalty of perjury
under the laws of the State of California that I delivered a true copy of the document to which this is attached to the parties or their
attorney addressed as listed above by placing the copy in a sealed envelope to the mail room of this court.
Date: February 19, 2010 JOHN A. CLARKE, Executive Officer/
Clerk of the Superior Court of California,
County of Los Angeles
by: M. Dewey, Deputy Clerk
Minutes Entered:
Department 5

Click to access Michael%20Jackson%20Ruling%202-19-10.pdf


Fire Officials: MJ Emergency Tape is Bogus

Another HOAX, 😉  Yep… you said it…

Posted Feb 24th 2010 6:00PM by TMZ Staff

Another Michael Jackson hoax — this time it’s all over a recording that’s being reported as a transmission from the paramedics who took MJ to UCLA on the day he died.

The recording features a man saying “Patient is Michael Jackson, the pop star singer … we should be there in five minutes. It doesn’t look good.”

But TMZ spoke to L.A. City Fire Dept. Captain Steve Ruda who told us, “It is not our conversation. It is not any of the paramedics who treated Michael Jackson.”

We’re told there are several indicators on the tape which show it could not have originated from an L.A. City Fire employee.

We’re told officials are not supposed to name the patient and the terminology used in the recording is not consistent with terms used by the department.
Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2010/02/24/fire-officials-mj-emergency-tape-is-bogus/#ixzz0gVJv2c7N


Doubts about purported Michael Jackson 911 tape

By Alan Duke, CNN
February 24, 2010 — Updated 2022 GMT (0422 HKT)

A London tabloid released a recording that purports to be a 911  call about Michael Jackson's death, but officials express doubts.

A London tabloid released a recording that purports to be a 911 call about Michael Jackson’s death, but officials express doubts.

Los Angeles, California (CNN) — A recording purported to be a call from the ambulance rushing Michael Jackson to a hospital the day he died was not “typical” of paramedic procedure, according to a Los Angeles Fire Department official.

A British tabloid posted the recording online, suggesting it was evidence that Jackson had no pulse at that time — contrary to what his personal doctor said.

Dr. Conrad Murray has been charged with involuntary manslaughter in Jackson’s June 25 death, which the coroner ruled resulted from a combination of drugs given to him that morning.

The Sun newspaper did not reveal the source of the recording, but characterized it as a “911 tape.”

Brian Humphrey, a spokesman for the Los Angeles Fire Department, said he was skeptical about the authenticity of the audio, adding that it “did not come from our agency.”

A male — who says he is a paramedic in an ambulance — is heard speaking to a female, who supposedly is at the UCLA Medical Center emergency room.

“We have a male, 50. Pop star Michael Jackson. Unresponsive, no pulse. Tried to resuscitate him. Unsuccessful. We are en route,” the male voice said.

“OK. We’ll have doctors standing by,” the female voice replied.

“We’ve done everything we can here in the ambulance. Hopefully, when we get there — we should be there in five minutes,” the male said. “It doesn’t look good.”

Humphrey said it is routine for paramedics to use a cell phone or a two-way radio to talk to an emergency room as they rush to a hospital, but they “don’t normally speak like this in a medical response.”

Specifically, the paramedic would not be likely to use a patient’s name in the conversation, even if it is a celebrity, Humphrey said.

It would be routine for the hospital to record the conversations for legal reasons, he said.

UCLA Medical Center spokesman Dale Triber Tate said, “There is no way we could authenticate it even if we had patient/estate authorization, which we do not have.”

The fire department released an authenticated recording of the 911 call for help from Jackson’s Holmby Hills, California, home the day after the pop icon’s death.

A Jackson bodyguard, who was in the room as Murray tried to revive him, spoke to the 911 operator:

“He’s not breathing and we’re trying to pump him, but he’s not breathing,” the bodyguard said. “He’s not responding to CPR or anything,”

“We’re less than a mile away and we’ll be there shortly,” the operator said.

Hoax recordings have emerged since Jackson’s death, including a video produced by a German TV show that purported to show a living Jackson stepping out of a coroner’s van.

A spokeswoman for RTL, the leading private broadcaster in Germany, later said it was an experiment to show how easy it is to spread rumors online.


GlaxoSmithKline deliberately hid evidence of Avandia harm

Tuesday, February 23, 2010
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

GlaxoSmithKline, maker of the diabetes drug Avandia, knew the drug was linked to tens of thousands of heart attacks but went out of its way to hide this information from the public, says a 334-page report just released by the Senate Finance Committee. (http://finance.senate.gov/press/Gpr…)

This report also accuses the FDA of betraying the public trust, explaining that FDA bureaucrats intentionally dismissed safety concerns found by the agency’s own scientists.

The report says that Big Pharma’s drugs “put public safety at risk because the FDA has been too cozy with drug makers and has been regularly outmaneuvered by companies that have a financial interest in downplaying or under-exploring potential safety risks.” Sales of Avandia were $3.2 billion (yes, billion) in 2006.

According to a statistical analysis in the report, if all the diabetics currently taking Avandia were put on a “safer” drug, it would avert 500 heart attacks and 300 cases of heart failure every month in the United States alone. Presently, hundreds of thousands of Americans are still taking this drug, and hundreds will continue to die each month as a result, according to the report estimates.

This report, championed by U.S. Senators Grassley and Baucus, is the result of investigators pouring through more than 250,000 pages of documentation gathered from GlaxoSmithKline and the FDA. The document reveals some rather startling facts about the dangers of Avandia, including evidence from the FDA’s own scientists who concluded that Avandia was associated with 83,000 heart attacks.

GlaxoSmithKline intimidates scientists

This investigative report also reveals that GSK engaged in the intimidation of physicians, saying: “GSK executives attempted to intimidate independent physicians, focused on strategies to minimize or misrepresent findings that Avandia may increase cardiovascular risk and sought ways to downplay findings that a competing drug might reduce cardiovascular risk.”

“Patients trust drug companies with their health and their lives, and GlaxoSmithKline abused that trust.” said Sen. Baucus. (Gee, really? Is anyone really surprised that GSK put its own financial interests ahead of a few thousand human lives?)

A separate letter sent to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg by Senators Baucus and Grassley added, “the totality of evidence suggests that GSK was aware of the possible cardiac risks associated with Avandia years before such evidence became public.”

The FDA’s own research also showed Avandia to be associated with a significant increase in heart attack risk, yet the FDA did nothing to protect the public. The agency’s own scientists wrote in 2008, “There is strong evidence that rosiglitazone [Avandia] confers an increased risk of [heart attacks] and heart failure compared to pioglitazone [a rival drug on market].” This evidence went completely ignored at the FDA.

The FDA’s famous Dr David Graham — the key whistleblower on the Vioxx scandal — concluded from his own research, “Rosiglitazone should be removed from the market.”

Even the American Medical Association — a long-time defender of Big Pharma’s drugs — admitted Avandia was dangerous. Its journal, JAMA, wrote in 2007: “Among patients with impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes, rosiglitazone use for at least 12 months is associated with a significantly increased risk of myocardial infarction and heart failure, without a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular mortality.”

The New England Journal of Medicine also warned about the safety of the drug in an article published in 2007.

Despite these multiple warnings, an FDA panel voted 22 – 1 in favor of keeping Avandia on the market. This is no surprise, of course, to those who know how the FDA really operates (and where its priorities really lie).

Analysis: What does it all mean?

Are you kidding me? A drug company hid data that its high-profit drug was linked to increased risk of heart attacks? A drug company intimidated physicians and got away with hoodwinking the public while raking in billions of dollars in sales for a drug that the FDA’s own scientists said should be pulled from the market?

Sounds like business as usual at the FDA, the “sweep it under the rug” division of the pharmaceutical industry. Once again, Dr David Graham turns out to be the sharpest guy in the room while having the courage to tell the truth even when surrounded by an agency full of morons and criminals.

The drug industry must hate this guy. But they can’t get rid of him because he’s one of the very few scientists in the FDA who is actually committed to protecting the public. Gee, what a concept, huh? The FDA as a whole abandoned that idea so long ago that virtually nobody there even remembers what it means. Protect the public? What do you mean? As in, lose profits by banning dangerous drugs that just happen to be making big money?

That’s unthinkable at the FDA as we know it today. The agency exists to promote pharmaceuticals, not to limit their sales just because a hundred thousand people happen to drop dead each year from taking FDA-approved drugs.

When it comes to safety vs. profits, the FDA chooses profits for Big Pharma time and time again.

Do the math on this: If Avandia is linked to 83,000 heart attacks, and if roughly 50% of those are fatal (that’s just an estimate), then Avandia could conceivably be the cause of 40,000 deaths. The terrorist attacks of 9/11 killed roughly 3,000 Americans, and yet just one drug that has been mysteriously kept on the market by the FDA appears to have killed more than ten times as many Americans as the terrorists.

So what does that make the FDA? More dangerous than the terrorists, of course!

So why is the FDA still allowed to operate in America if it’s such a dangerous organization that’s killing so many American citizens? Because it’s profitable, of course!

There’s one thing that’s true about both WAR and MEDICINE: As long as the right corporations are making money, it really doesn’t matter how many people die in the process.

And for all those diabetic Americans struggling to find improved health right now, there’s something you desperately need to know: There’s a price to putting your faith in the FDA, the drug companies and your pill-pushing doctor. That price may very well be your own life.

Diabetes has a cure, you know. You can reverse it in as little as four days by changing your diet. Read the books on diabetes by Dr Gabriel Cousens or Dr Julian Whitaker. Or read more about diabetes right here on NaturalNews: http://naturalnews.com/diabetes.html

Here’s the full report from the U.S. Senate (PDF):
http://finance.senate.gov/press/Gpr…


Kangaroos poisoned by fluoride

It poisons the Kangaroos, but it’s still being added to our water. Nothing wrong with that, right????

By Candice Wyatt

Updated Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:09pm AEDT

Kangaroos

Fluoride from a nearby alumininum smelter is making Portland kangaroos ill. (ABC Local : Margaret Burin )

The Environment Protection Authority (EPA) says fluoride from Alcoa’s aluminium smelter at Portland is making kangaroos sick.

The EPA’s Bruce Dawson says the fluoride is being absorbed by the nearby vegetation which is then being eaten by the kangaroos.

He says the fluoride poisons the kangaroos and makes lesions grow on their bones, which renders them lame.

“Once kangaroos have restricted movement [it] has a significant impact on their welfare. So this is something that needs to be managed and avoided.”

He says there is not a lot of information around about the impact of fluoride on kangaroos.

The problem is more common in cattle.

“There was a lot of research done in the 60s and 70s in the United States but this really has just started to emerge in terms of the impacts on kangaroos.”

Tags: human-interest, animals, animals, vic, ballarat-3350, portland-3305

First posted Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:30am AEDT


A Final Conversation with MJ on June 25, 2009!

This is TINI member.


Doctor Gets Court Order to Confine Pregnant Woman Against Her Will

In case those of u who don’t find anything wrong with this, ask yourselves this: where was this woman’s rights? And if it were YOU, how would you take this?  Still think you’re “free”????

With issues like the Stupak Amendment and Nevada’s Personhood Initiative in the national spotlight, I am aware that a woman’s right to choose whether or not to carry a fetus to full-term is under attack.

What I didn’t realize, perhaps naively, is that her right to choose how to carry a fetus is also under fire. Last March, Florida resident Samantha Burton was in week 25 of her pregnancy when she paid a visit to her doctor. Burton was showing signs of potential miscarriage, so her physician ordered bed rest. Burton explained that, as a working mother of two toddlers, bed rest simply wasn’t a viable option and then proceeded to ask for a second medical opinion. Seems reasonable, right?

Her doctor, however, was having none of that. Rather than refer Burton for the desired second opinion, he instead felt it necessary to contact state authorities, who then proceeded to force Burton to be admitted to Tallahassee Memorial Hospital against her will and undergo any procedure the doctor felt like prescribing. When Burton had the audacity to request a change in the hospital in which she was being treated, the court denied her request. Three days into her forced hospitalization, Burton miscarried.

Never mind that there is actually no scientific research to support the claim that bed rest helps prevent preterm birth and that even the American College of of Obstetricians and Gynecologists does not believe it should be routinely recommended. Never mind Burton’s very real concern for the care of her two small children. Never mind the psychological, physical, and financial toll this takes on her family. The only thing that mattered to the doctor and the government was that they got their (ultimately ineffectual) way.

(more…)


Harvard Fellow Calls For Genocidal Measure To Curb Palestinian Births

By

politicaltheatrics

Published: February 22, 2010

Harvard Fellow Calls For Genocidal Measure To Curb Palestinian  Births

A fellow at Harvard University’s Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Martin Kramer, has called for “the West” to take measures to curb the births of Palestinians, a proposal that appears to meet the international legal definition of a call for genocide.

Kramer, who is also a fellow at the influential Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), made the call early this month in a speech at Israel’s Herzliya conference, a video of which is posted on his blog (”Superfluous young men,” 7 February 2010).

In the speech Kramer rejected common views that Islamist “radicalization” is caused by US policies such as support for Israel, or propping up despotic dictatorships, and stated that it was inherent in the demography of Muslim societies such as Yemen, Iraq, Afghanistan and the Israeli-occupied Gaza Strip. Too many children, he argued, leads to too many “superfluous young men” who then become violent radicals.

Kramer proposed that the number of Palestinian children born in the Gaza Strip should be deliberately curbed, and alleged that this would “happen faster if the West stops providing pro-natal subsidies to Palestinians with refugee status.”

Due to the Israeli blockade, the vast majority of Palestinians in Gaza are now dependent on UN food aid. Neither the UN, nor any other agencies, provide Palestinians with specifically “pro-natal subsidies.” Kramer appeared to be equating any humanitarian assistance at all with inducement for Palestinians to reproduce.

He added, “Israel’s present sanctions on Gaza have a political aim — undermine the Hamas regime — but if they also break Gaza’s runaway population growth, and there is some evidence that they have, that might begin to crack the culture of martyrdom which demands a constant supply of superfluous young men.” This, he claimed, would be treating the issue of Islamic radicalization “at its root.”

The 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, created in the wake of the Nazi holocaust, defines genocide to include measures “intended to prevent births within” a specific “national, ethnic, racial or religious group.”

The Weatherhead Center at Harvard describes itself as “the largest international research center within Harvard University’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences.” In addition to his positions at Harvard and WINEP, Kramer is “president-designate” of Shalem College in Jerusalem, a far-right Zionist institution that aspires to be the “College of the Jewish People.”

Pro-Israel speakers from the United States often participate in the the Herzliya conference, an influential annual gathering of Israel’s political and military establishment. This year’s conference was also addressed by The New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman and, in a first for a Palestinian official, by Salam Fayyad, appointed prime minister of the Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority.

Kramer’s call to prevent Palestinian births reflects a long-standing Israeli and Zionist concern about a so-called “demographic threat” to Israel, as Palestinians are on the verge of outnumbering Israeli Jews within Israel, and the occupied Palestinian territories combined.

Such extreme racist views have been aired at the Herzliya conference in the past. In 2003, for example, Dr. Yitzhak Ravid, an Israeli government armaments expert, called on Israel to “implement a stringent policy of family planning in relation to its Muslim population,” a reference to the 1.5 million Palestinian citizens of Israel.